Book Analysis: The Science of Muddling Through

This article describes two different strategy comparison strategies. The first strategy, Lindblom Certified Root, or Rational-Comprehensive Lindblom, called the second strategy Branch or Successive Limited Comparisons. After a brief description of the two systems, he continues to argue that the branch system is better than the more general route system II. root

According to Lindblom, the Root method or the Rational-Comprehensive method is best suited for solving simple problems.

The specific difficulty of values ​​is an attempt to describe marginal targets in a form other than specific policies. This allows administrators to choose strategies to provide different combinations of limit values. Lindblom finished this discussion in two ways. First, for complex problems, the root system is impossible and irrelevant, and the branching method is feasible and appropriate. Since the administrator does not have to try to analyze values ​​other than alternative strategies and the difference is only slightly larger, the branching method is feasible. This greatly reduces the need to gather value and target information, thereby allowing you to compare value within a reasonable range. Relationship between the means and the edge of the bay

Usually, according to the Route Law, decision making is considered a means - relationship of purpose. Before selecting the device, the device is evaluated and selected based on independently selected objectives. However, as long as that value is agreed and is not stable beyond the limit, it is difficult. This relationship between means and purposes

In only one article, I found that there is still extensive bibliography. It was written by American political scholar Charles Lindblom and published in 1959 by "Science of Confusion". Professor Lindblom used the "branch" approach to compare the so-called "root" decision-making method. The fundamental law requires a comprehensive assessment of options against established targets. Bifurcation method involves building a gradual and minor degree from the current situation. Professor Lindblom said, "The fundamental approach does not really apply to complex policy issues in practice." The actual person must obey the branching method - the science of confusion

The last semester, my students, and I discussed the article of Charles Lindbrom's 1959 "Science of Confusion". This provides a thoughtful analysis of how policy decisions are made. Lindblom argues that legislators plan policies in two ways. The first way "route method" involves working from scratch every time a decision is made, taking into account all factors related to immediate problems. In the second method, "Bifurcation method", decision makers can proceed based on existing policies, but at the end there are only minor changes. While the fundamental law provides the best way to achieve substantial policy reforms, the branching approach - promoting incremental policy changes - represents the most politically viable policy development method I will.

More and more political scientists and sociologists pay attention to political decisions as important political acts. Lindblom's groundbreaking research "Science of confusion" has launched a new systematic approach to help policy makers to learn how to make decisions. His progressive decision was always the basic form of political decision-making in Western countries. There are two main aspects of gradual decision-making. The first is about policy design. It is arguing that the reality of politics determines a gradual analysis of policies. Decision makers will focus on changing and supplementing specific policies only if they face existing basic consensus values. Policy selection and selection will continue. Incrementalism thinks decision making is an agreement and a compromise between various political forces.