Bob Dylan explains why he won Nobel Prize in long-winded lecture

After skipping the last Nobel Prize winning dinner in 2016, Bob Dylan received a six month deadline to share the Nobel Prize for officially winning the Nobel Prize for literature.

On Monday, the organization shared a recorded version of Dylan's speech and recorded a 27-minute play address for free in June. A 76-year-old singer / composer began his speech by addressing questions raised by many critics at the first award: why this famous literary prize is mainly for artists who are considered musicians Is it awarded? What?

"When I was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature, I began to wonder if my song had something to do with literature," he said.

Dylan uses the same lively words and deceitful stories as a symbol of his collection and explains how his classical at school influenced his music. "When I started writing my own songs, I knew only folklore terms," ​​he said. "But there are other things to me ... I have principles and feelings.I have a clear view of the world.I have been there for a while.I have learned everything at the grammar school.Don Quixote, Ivanho, Rubin. Regarding drifting, the rest of Gulliver's trip is "the story of two cities".

"The reading of a typical grammar school gives you a way to observe life, an understanding of the nature of man, and standards for measuring things," he continued. "When I started writing lyrics, I brought all of this to me, and the theme in these books is reflected in many of my songs, whether intentionally or not."

In the rest of the lecture, Dylan promises to talk about three literary works "Moby Dick", "Quiet in the Western Front", and "Odyssey" inspired by his imaginary details. At the last moment of the speech, he acknowledged that "songs are different from literature, they mean singing, not reading," and then share the words from Odyssey.

The Swedish Academy has given Dylan the 2016 Nobel Prize for Literature "thanks to the creation of a new poetic expression in the American song tradition." Dylan visited Stockholm in April to accept Nobel's diploma and medals with an invitation to refuse traditional Nobel Prize banquets and ceremonies held on December 10.

I sent a quick, emotional tweet when I saw Bob Dylan won the Nobel prize on last Friday. Five black and blue dresses If you do not choose one party at once, are you really online? A few hours later I began to wonder why I had this internal reaction to this news. After all, I like Dylan's music. When I was a high school student, my cousin introduced me to "Rainy Woman # 12 & # 35". It looks as if someone showed me a map of the dry land. "Blue entanglement" is the most important thing in my adolescence. In the 1920s, I grieved at "Girls from the North". I am doing a festival of poetry in Miami now, but its mission is to make everyone in Miami see the poem. Expansion of public definition of poetry

Bob Dylan received the Nobel Prize for literature! Bob Dylan! Some people are surprised or dissatisfied with this news, but I am not. Why is Bob? I am not a prefecture. His victory reminds me of the charm of my fan boy against his lyrics, and since he is currently awarded the Nobel Prize his work deserves an appropriate literary analysis. In his 50 years of career as a composer, Dylan wrote several incredibly wonderful incredible lyrics, but there are some easiest and sincere ones. I decided to interpret "Workingman's Blues # 2" from the 2006 album "Modern Times". This is one of my favorite songs in the Dylan catalog. It is literally metaphorical, both timely and timeless, incredibly simple. So here is the lyrics and my authoritative analysis.

The good news is that Bob Dylan was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature. The bad news is that the Nobel Prize for literature is attributed to Bob Dylan. After waiting for our own writer to be recognized for a long time, it gave an award to Americans, so it is very good. As we always think, I can hardly think of Dylan as a writer, so it is not good. Poet, novelist, essayist, playwright. Steven Metcalf wrote to Mr. Slate that although Dylan is not a writer, he has innovative and global influence, he can not say that he deserves victory. It is not a composer, writer, poet. I wrote a very long and exciting topic in 2007, you can read it carefully here. To summarize, Dylan is not a poet, it is a songwriter who writes lyrics, it is now a completely different art than poetry, and everyone else was disassembled and reconstructed without doing it.