Bleikasten’s Literary Analysis of Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury

The literary analysis of Falekner's "Shu and Fury" aims to understand the ambiguity of contemporary literature, the personal interest of Faulkner against Katie, and her role as a fictitious character. A fictitious older brother and her real reader. For Bleikasten, Katie seems to play a role at multiple levels as an ideal creation, Faulkner as a fulfillment of what is missing in life, and / or lack / presence of dichotomy as a subject.

Sartre and Brooks' Literary Criticism: Memory and Time Analysis in Faulkner's "Sound and Anger" "History is a testimony of the passage of time" Xcelo predicted research on historical memory and time concepts, but what is the hypothesis? And I remember how we transformed the past into mere events over time. - Literary analysis of Faulkner's "Shu and Fury" by Bleikasten, Kaidi's image, Bleikasten's article is to understand the ambiguity of modern literature, Faulkner's personal interests to Katie, and her role as a fictitious role It is aimed at. The role of her fictional brother and her actual reader

When William Faulkner first published his novel "The Sound and the Fury" in 1929, it was not only severely criticized but also very embarrassing. Faulkner paved the way for literary modernism by completely abandoning the structure of most traditional forms and sentences. The framework of Faulkner behind the structure of "hearing impairment and confusion" can be seen as a way he divides the book into four parts. - Sound and anger: Nobility William Faulkner wrote many of the potential themes of sound and anger. In my opinion, the most prominent theme is the nobility's responsibility. Faulkner expressed Comson 's aristocratic duty in response to the tragedy that had a unique influence on each person. Even Catherine, Jason, Quentin, and even Benji, forced the responsibility to protect their daughter and sister Katie throughout the novel while protecting the rights of the nobility of the whole family.