According to a study published by the US Decision Committee on Tuesday, the average sentence to serve an African American male is about 20% longer than that of a white man.
Analyzing the data that the organization sentenced to white and black sentences between 2008 and 2016, it turned out that the sentence of a black man was 19.1% longer than the average sentence of a white man.
The committee stated that this difference can not be explained by whether violators have a history of violence.
"After managing various judgment factors, the European Commission believes that black male criminals continue to accept longer punishments in the same position than white male criminals, female criminals are shorter than white male criminals I sentenced to prison "Conclusion of the study
"The committee also revealed that previous violent crimes did not make a significant contribution to the demographic differences of the federal judgment, as recorded in the criminal record of perpetrators," It was.
This survey was only announced after a few months after directing Jeff Sessions Minister of Justice to overthrow Mr. Obama's decision and condemn the prosecutor for suspecting the most serious crime. The Obama administration is trying to ease the minimum penalty for nonviolent drug crime
"This is the basic principle, prosecutors should prove and pursue the most serious and easiest crimes," he wrote in the memo of May. "This policy confirms our responsibility to enforce laws, ethics and justice and to generate consistency."
The move was criticized by the proponents of criminal justice reform, believing that most of their efforts were blocked by the Department of Justice of the session.
"We need to deal with the outbreak of drugs in our country, which is a crisis of public health, not an excuse to turn people into prisons and turn mistakes into tragedies, this is not about the legalization of drugs RK Senator I wrote it in response to the movement of the session.
According to new research, there are still uneasy dilemmas in prison sentences and ethnic problems. A black man who committed the same crime as a white man was sentenced to federal sentence and the average sentence was extended by about 20%. It is based on new data from the US Judgment Committee. Professor of law at Georgetown University and former federal prosecutor Paul Butler joined. Mr. Butler Thank you for being with me. Butler: The federal judgment guidelines are designed to remove criminal justice procedures, especially judgments from discrimination. I am worried that the judge is not allowed to actually do the work. It's as if they were input elements of a computer programmer, then it seems that they have to issue the instructions required by the guide
A person who was sentenced to a long term sentence was more likely to have a problem than a white man who was convicted of the same crime when African Americans were intercepted and investigated by the police and indicted for sin . A black child was arrested for a minor crime, but when the white CEO had escaped from the country it was a bit wrong. Imagine that it is 500% more likely that white children will die from asthma than black children. A 50% white Caucasian baby has died twice as much as an African-American baby by the first birthday. Imagine a strong protest. Imagine the influx of resources
One way the judicial system suppresses black prisoners is to pronounce sentences. According to many reports, for similar crimes, black males have longer sentences than white males. After the decision by the US v. Booker in 2005, the organization has studied this problem closely. According to the ruling, the judge can strengthen the judgment of the defendant based on the facts provided during the trial. This is up to them, and the judge must follow the guidelines set by the judgment committee. The report shows that this difference can not be explained when considering the history of violence. I do not think this will explain the evidence presented. In lawsuits targeting African Americans, some may argue that there may be better evidence to allow judges to increase fines. However, this is an overly extensive statement to explain that the judgment difference is close to 20%.