Birthcontrol and the Work Of Margaret Sanger

Birth control and work of Margaret Sanger's work are cited as "free race is not born", women can not claim to be free, owning and dominating their bodies Can not. There was no woman who could freely participate in "Sanger A 35" before she could consciously choose whether she wanted to be a mother or not. Margaret Sanger (1870 - 1966) mentioned this in many controversial papers. The issue of Margaret Sanger's name and birth control is actually synonymous, and birth control and Sanger's work are the work of women in society, the relationship between men and women, and many jobs in changing family I did it.

Margaret Higgins Sanger (September 14, 1879 - September 6, 1966, Margaret Louis Higgins, also known as Margaret Sangsley) is the United States. Contraceptive activists, sex educators, writers and nurses. Sanger promoted the term "birth control", opened the first contraceptive clinic in the United States, and established an organization developed into the American family planning association. Sanger used her sentences and speech mainly to promote her way of thinking. According to the Comstock Law in 1914, she was indicted for "family restrictions". She was afraid of what would happen, so she ran to England until she noticed it was safe to return to America. Sanger's efforts have led to several judicial actions to help legalize contraception in the United States. Because of her relationship with family planning, Sanger is often subject to criticism of abortion.

In 1966, Martin Luther King Jr. revealed that Sanger's life was agreed not to be inhumane. In 1966, when King received the Margaret Sanger human rights award from planned custody, he admired the contribution to the black community. "There is an eye-opener blood relationship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts," he said. "... .... Margaret Sanger had to commit what he was called crime at the time to enrich human beings and today we respect her courage and foresight." As a strategy , As many eugenic scholars are against contraception, the reason is that educated people will use it more. Her own work is directed to voluntary contraception and public health programs, but her use of eugenics may help to prove disinfection abuse. Her misjudgment should wonder what kind of parallel errors we are currently committing and cast doubts on strategies that do not reflect the goals we want to achieve.