Beyond the Great Debates: Gender and Race in Early America

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader

Now people in the United States are starting to discuss the use of race and gender preferences by federal, state and local governments. In 1996, most California state voters, including 29% of blacks, approved the California civil rights initiative. This prohibits incentives in public employment, education, and contracts. In a series of cases, the Supreme Court and the Federal Court of Appeal revealed that the priority system is based on highly unstable grounds. These incidents - mainly Adarland's decision in 1995 - determining the ethnic grouping are assumed to be unconstitutional and only allowed under special circumstances. In 1998, Congress could consider establishing legislation to terminate the use of racial and sexual preferences by the federal government.

Race and sex. With regard to race and gender, the application of relativism and social justice has had a great influence, especially from critical ethnic theory. Cornel West's "Prophecy Criticism" and the 1993 book "Keeping Faith: American Philosophy and Race" explain this and their argument is political. Both national security relativism and social justice have great influence on FBI and CIA. Charles Hill, a researcher at the Hoover Institute in Stanford University, published an editorial in the Wall Street Journal after the 2001 World Trade Center bombing incident. "But when I retired in June 2001, Louis Freeh regarded the diversity of the agent as one of his greatest accomplishments, a similar policy exists for the CIA.