Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

Of course, he does not seem to exist because the possibility of the existence of God is obvious to man. Almost all cultures in history believe in at least one god, but the opposite argument against the existence of the Christian god has been going on for centuries. In his graduate school, John Calvin, he said that God has knowledge of his existence in all human minds, he said: human thought, in fact, outside the natural instinct, some There is the divinity of us We are his memory frequently he, God Himself, everyone try to understand his divinity to some extent to prevent everyone ignoring ignorance So, I think it is room for discussion

Not only we can reasonably not suspect that we live in the simulation, but also the assumption - that by obeying the same logic it is certain that God and God will happen It is. It does not matter whether my definition of "human" or not - its ability to build computing resources in the universe far beyond our scope of understanding that intelligence can include subjective experience There is a need to grasp the ultimate command of all things, or at least involvement as the space we live and all competing things related to time

Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubts, transcending serious doubts, transcending reason, knowing, doubting wisely, there is no doubt that evolution is the fact. Evidence evidence is at least as strong as the evidence of the Holocaust, even witnesses can even participate in the Holocaust. The obvious fact is that we are a cousin of a chimpanzee, a somewhat distant cousin of a monkey, a farther cousin still aardvarks and manatees, as well as farther cousins ​​of bananas and turnips have long ..... You still need to be included in the list

When making a judgment in a criminal trial, the jury must be convinced that the person is guilty and suspect. With reasonable doubt, there is an example of two reasons, both may explain what happened, with the evidence provided together, the jury found the interests of the suspect Given, it should be decided to be innocent. The jury verdict need not be consistent. In a criminal case, 10 people within a reasonable period of time within (less than 2 hours) have the same judgment if the jury has agreed to hear the case after the verdict. In a civil trial, the vast majority of nine out of twelve members can ruling