Belief and Knowledge

Our current world is confronted with a lot of discussion and we need a thorough thinking process to express the aspect of discussion. I saw many different authorities say to us that we should think in some direction. However, most people need to know the impact of these various sources, such as academia, politicians, companies, global organizations and media. Maybe they can give us knowledge about the problem, or information about each side, but when it falls to the bottom, faith and knowledge are the numbers of most people.

The conclusion of our discussion is this. When we explore the relationship between faith and knowledge, we focus on the relationship between beliefs and knowledge. In the latter term of Russell, we are comparing the two "propositional attitudes"; of course, they may be attitude toward the same proposition. If we compare beliefs with knowledge and treat them as low level alternatives to knowledge, contrast is primarily between "knowledge" and "belief". Similarly, when you define knowledge based on beliefs, you define "knowledge" according to "beliefs"; the remaining contrasts are contrasts of "knowledge" and "just" beliefs, or "equivalent". Comparing the "belief" of knowledge with the beliefs you do not know Let's see the difference between "believe" and "knowledge". What should I say?

What should I say about the difference between knowledge and belief? (Of course, strictly speaking, it is a way to distinguish beliefs, it is equivalent to beliefs lacking knowledge and knowledge, or if you want it is a distinction between knowledge and beliefs, not distinction The majority of our geographical knowledge and historical knowledge belongs to this type, for example, countries like Australia, lions in Africa, Napoleon III of France etc. For example, today By reading the newspaper, I learned (understand) that the prime minister made a speech in Bradford yesterday, a short - term historical knowledge.