Let's be a fair leader. To become a leader, it is the goal of most people to control and guide people in the right direction. Of course, being a hero of the group means that the individual has great power to the public and can influence people according to his wishes. As this person surpasses others and reaches the goal of beginning to dominate others, that person's duties will be simpler and less demanding. However, the role of the leader is very difficult and challenging.
Semantics is very important. As a leader, some people think we should be "fair". Fairness is a prerequisite for becoming a "leader", not a tyrant. This is another aspect of culture - as a common understanding leader as to how things work here, we are equitable to their function and the most useful to those who carry out our work You may expect to "shape" the definition of sex. Some of the most important aspects of fairness are reflected in how we allocate work, reward success, and deal with personal weaknesses. The basic level of impartiality is equal treatment, as evidenced by the strength of labor union activities, everyone is getting the same remuneration for the same work at the same level. You get the same reward in the same position with the same qualification. The same drawback or failure will produce the same remedy or disciplinary response
Leaders should deal with people that they lead fairly. Followers are expected to do a "fair job" for "good day's wages" but rarely to discuss the fairness of the people they follow. It does not mean that this is not a problem. Rather, they believe that fairness depends on power, because they confuse the authority and power of the organization. Our view is that fairness flows up and down the facility chain. The leaders are in tune and most organizations have fair expectations. However, there are circumstances where "fair" leaders expect to see reciprocity justified - they have the right to expect them to lead them to treat them fairly.