The sentence of one word at the beginning of the article is not a cliche. If you discuss sentences in sentences and start writing creative writing, I think you are at a different pitch. However, I think that it depends on your audience in terms of using a sentence of one word.
If you are writing this article for English class, my advice ... do not do this. Your audience is an English teacher (perhaps a few relevant major educational assistants). In a college article of a teacher you do not know (or you do not know), especially if this was the first thing you read after the title, the sentences of the word seem cluttered. If your title is the same as the sentence, it is even worse, for example:
I still disagree if you know the flexibility of your teacher and teacher about these things. The first line and the second line can be combined into one sentence unless you intend to point on the first line. If so, I will isolate it and try to enrich it. For example, if you simply say "google-esque", you would like the reader to think "what a strange word, what do you mean", but I want to say it. Unless your position has already been explained. Example:
But say that you are writing this article for a different class, maybe you can avoid such things. I just do not know what kind of class it will be. I do not think this applies to technical papers etc. Your audience is still "professional" (or again TA), the structure of this sentence ... is not abnormal, but not so normal. If it is a weak structure, it will slightly weaken the overall reading
If you really want to use a single word sentence, I will not encourage you to say Google at the beginning of both sentences. It is a bit uncomfortable to repeat. 'Google-esque.Google-esque is ......' is the same word, it ignited twice in succession. Your title is also three times the "Google style". It is monotonous. If you change the structure of the second sentence, maybe you can escape that your first line is a sentence of a word
We count the number of times Walsh used the word "I" in the linked recommendation article above. I wrote that the first person has no essential problem (this sentence begins with the word "I"), but as a rhetorical style to show the deepness she is obsessed with herself I am counting on too much. Impact of analysis This includes intensive and long-term multifaceted efforts to intercept the Democratic Party from the large-scale ruts that are currently being found, and although necessary, but not enough efforts, in any situation It is to create a new type of news specialty media. People like Walsh are at the forefront, and the party is destined to fail more. When you see Walsh leading the "resistance movement" there, what do you think about the emotions of playing cards? He is very pleased about this as it makes the "resistance movement" look like a joke
It is the cliché that starts a story that recognizes Cliche as Cliche. In the second sentence there are two or three levels of cliche, but Cliché is no longer a real word. This weekend, I encountered a big car accident, but fortunately, all the participants were completely intact. I never thought that this would happen. That's right. Everyone has a moment, something never happens to them, only the other things that will eventually happen
The cliche is not found in the admission documents of the university. Cliché is a phrase of abuse and depletion, and the use of cliche makes original prose without passion. In your article, the entrance staff is excited about the topics of you and your paper, but there is nothing to get excited about Cliche. Instead, they reduced the information in the paper and revealed the lack of author's creativity. The author writes about her brother who had a great influence on her life. But her praise is almost completely complicated and complicated. Applicants have already proposed a phrase that the readers heard millions of times, not her brothers sound like "one millionth". All these clichés will soon not make your readers interested in their brothers.