Baumrind and Zimbardo Demonstrate that People their Behavior Change Depending on Outside Forces

Because human behaviorists are related to obedience in authoritative relationships, we have studied the behavioral changes of people for a long time. Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo tested responses to authority with important variables manipulated during the experiment and implemented two of the most well-accepted submissive studies. However, some psychologists such as Dina Baumrind, a psychologist at the Human Development Institute, should be done to test human frivolous reactions unless the subject clearly understands the purpose I believe it.

In 1971, the prison experiment by Stanford University psychology professor Philip Zimbardo was very bad. He studied how people's behavior changes in extreme situations, simulated the underground prison at the university and decided to recruit students to fulfill the role of prisoners and security guards. The Stanford Prison Experiment Project lasted two weeks, but must end on day 5 due to the bad abuse of the assigned prisoner. Zimbird explained on his website:

According to Zimbabwe and his colleagues Stanford Prison's experiment shows an important role that this can play in human behavior. As guards take power, they begin to show ways they do not act normally in their daily lives and other circumstances. In an uncontrollable situation, the prisoner becomes passive and disappears. Stanford prison experiments are often quoted as examples of unethical studies. Today researchers can not reproduce this experiment, as it does not meet the standards set by many ethical guidelines, including the American Psychological Association's ethical guidelines. Zimbabwe acknowledged the ethical problem of this research, "We ended the study one week earlier than planned, but we did not finish the study as soon as possible".

There is a big argument in psychology as to whether the situation can make people act in some way or depends on their own characteristic. In the case of Zimbabwe, the behavior of people in this experiment is based on the situation rather than the participants' internal characteristics. Volunteers will play the part of the teacher and other parties. The teacher answers the question of the learner by telephone. If the learner gets the wrong answer, the teacher will give them electric shock. The strength of the impact will increase after each wrong answer