Autonomy Vs. Paternalism In Mental Health Treatment

Parental style ethics course in autonomous and competitive mental health treatment is to review Jacob's treatment as stated in New York State Mental Disorder Care Quality Council (1994). We are also asked to comment on each of the three major issues. It will include agencies, families and review committees. This student starts with Mr. Gordon's fourth angle. In the question of Jacob Gordon (1994), it is the story of the last eight years of the life of the mentally disabled.

This article describes the concept of parental style related to mental health. Here, the basic principle is not to be autonomous but to protect patients (Dudzinski & Sullivan, 2004). However, emphasis is placed on encouraging the patient's participation in full assessment and decision-making of the patient's ability to promote the mental health of the client and maintain a therapeutic relationship between the healthcare provider and the patient You should put it.

In the past 40 years, the principle of autonomy, the right to make decisions in its own way has transcended the parent's style. From patriarchal to autonomous, power and control are transferred from the doctor to the patient. Currently there are federal laws over 20 years, including making decisions about patients, refusing treatment and protecting the rights others might think. It is not their best interest. It asks the healthcare provider to follow the patient's prior instructions including the desire to not revive. However, many studies indicate that healthcare practitioners often ignore prescribing prescriptions, especially if they conflict with the values ​​and beliefs of individual healthcare professionals in charge of treatment .

Autonomy means that the patient has the right to understand the treatment options, the advantages and disadvantages of each method, and to judge health problems without enforcement 37,38. For centuries it was a good deed of a form of parent style rather than credibility. However, autonomy became a major problem in the latter half of the 20th century, and new medical ethics replaced "mercy" with "informed consent" 7. If you use placebo without adequate patient information or consent, infringement of autonomy (spoofing) may occur. Patients' autonomy is threatened by the (merciful) father's attitude as a placebo is considered to require some kind of fraud in order to fulfill its function. The problem of autonomy becomes a more urgent task for individuals with suspicious consent.