Assisted Procreation

At first glance reproductive supplementary care does not necessarily violate the right to child identity. The violation is that the state has not taken enough serious attitude to regulate the problems of reproductive assistance technology. The province fulfills its voluntary responsibility to regulate this field by enabling donor confusion, implantation of multiple embryos, and collapse of donor documents. The state often does not impose criminal sanctions or punishments, but looks at it.

In Italy, ART is regulated by the Medical Assisted Reproductive Act (2004). The Act prohibits research and reproductive cloning, embryo manipulation, the provision of eggs or sperm for antiretroviral therapy, and cryopreservation of embryos (excluding embryo transplants for severe injury / disease prevention) . Fertilize and transfer up to 3 eggs per reproductive cycle. Sex selection allows only treatment of severe hereditary hereditary disorders by sperm classification. We prohibit representation of all forms. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is generally prohibited from selecting embryos, but implementation on a case by case basis is permitted. Genetic testing other than for medical purposes is prohibited. The use of ART is limited to stable heterosexual partners who live together, age of childbearing, over 18 years of age, recording infertility and providing an opportunity for adoption for the first time.

People who oppose equally through infertility discussions believe that the marriage system is basically to help childbirth and child rearing. They believe that they should not be allowed to get married, as two homosexuals should not be born. Birth is certainly a feature of many heterosexual marriages, but infertility does not determine the legal effect of such marriage. There are many linear couple who can not lay babies or can not choose children. Infertility claims ignore the fact that people get married for a variety of reasons unrelated to childbirth, such as love, friendship and friendship.

A common argument for gay marriage is that marriage is due to infertility and gay couples can not have children. We call it "discussion on fertility". Do you have persuasive power? "Discussion on reproductive ability" begins with a clear position that reproductive ability is necessary for human survival. Others argue that the existence of marriage is to ensure that this important event - birth - occurs in a long-term alliance. Advocates of this claim may recognize this marriage and pursue other goals - to ensure that the spouse is a person who can take care of him, and to make a single line sexual Direction of activity. However, he believes that all these other goals will contribute only to the main purpose of marriage.