ASM6-MHWV: The Decision That Threatens Democracy by Ronald...

One of the most threatening decisions of the Supreme Court on American democracy is the decision of the Citizen Federation. The judge identified money with speech by breaking legislation that was previously enacted and restricting companies and unions from spending money on advertisements before the election. Most people believe that money is not a distortion effect and the government has no place to decide whether such effects exist. As a result of this decision, the United States saw the rise of SuperPac and organization capable of raising and receiving unlimited amount of funds from companies and individuals. The campaign continues to influence the political situation in the United States as campaigns are trying to gather more and more money to defeat rivals, so people with greater currency warfare can win power in the election Will be higher.

This appeal to most of the choices depends on a poor democratic concept. In judging the democratic nature of political decision, Ronald Dworkin proposed a distinction between "selective sensitivity" and "not sensitive to selection" problems. In any democratic society there is a set of decisions to be decided by the will of the majority, the will of the majority, or other social selection rules, or at least by the preferences of the community. However, many questions are insensitive to selection. Because their solutions can be created without referring to what the public wants. He mentioned the death penalty and racial discrimination in employment as an example of insensitive problems (Dworkin, 2000, pp. 204-5).

Liquid democracy is a subset of democracy and a powerful voting model for collective decision making in large communities. Liquid democracy combines the advantages of direct democracy and representative democracy to build a truly democratic voting system that allows voters to vote directly on issues or delegate voting rights to trusted parties I will. By giving authority, people with domain-specific knowledge can have a better effect on the outcome of decision-making and lead to better governance throughout the country. For this reason, liquid democracy naturally evolved into elite politics, whose decisions are made primarily by people with the knowledge and experience necessary to make informed decisions about the problem.