My interest in this topic was caused for the first time by an infinite return on the article on fake news by Bloomberg columnist Megan McArdle, fact confirmation. Fake news usually constitutes a pocket of manufactured information, regardless of whether it is semi-truth or semi-fake, or the most famous lie for political purposes. Some fake news are as good as Marilyn Monroe's offer, and some fake news brings real results like helping Donald Trump acquire a real presidential position I will. In fact, checkers have emerged as a response to fake news. Properly presented, this situation left us a question version of Roman poet Juvenal: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will protect the guardian? Who will check facts inspectors in fact? What kind of grounds does these trusted or self-appointed fact checkers trust? You can not specify another layer of Super Fact Inspector. This is not a solution. After that, you need to become a fact inspector and KES council
Since the elections, the number of fake news articles on Facebook has increased rapidly. It is becoming increasingly clear that fake news is posted on Facebook and that it exceeds the actual news and it is becoming increasingly clear that "More than 99% of people think that it is true", Mark Zuckerberg's assertion There is at best a misunderstanding, in the worst case it is direct. Gizmodo reported that Facebook had a solution to dispel fake news, even failed to do it. Technical leaders have an obligation to call this Facebook. It is immoral to profit from a platform that can spread lies. Facebook needs to take measures to prevent fake news from spreading to that platform. To maintain transparency about the severity of the problem, Facebook needs to publish internal data and display and share the amount of fake news.