Article Analysis: Emotions and Choices by Robert C. Solomon

In this article, we examine the article of Robert C. Solomon's "Emotions and Choices" to determine what anger is and how rational people are responsible for anger. First, I must explain Solomon's argument. A simple summary of Solomon's assertion can be found in four ways: emotion judgment, emotion selection, emotion intentional, and emotion is reasonable. Referring to Solomon's words, he explains as follows.

There are several theories about emotions that believe that cognitive activities in the form of judgment, evaluation or thought are necessary to generate emotion. A prominent philosophical measure is Robert C. Solomon (eg "Passion, Emotions, and Meaning of Life" 1993). Solomon insisted that feelings were judgment. He suggested a more subtle perspective, his response to the so-called "standard objections" to cognitiveism. Since being a bad judgment regardless of emotion, judgment can not be identified by emotion. . Nicoflidia's evaluation of the theory leading to behavior is another example

After reading Aristotle's "anger" and Robert C. Solomon's "anger as a way of participating in the world" I found that anger is a strong emotion that can come from many sources. Comparing the two written papers, Aristotle and Solomon seem to be doing the same thing about the cause of anger. In other words, senders and recipients need to complete their anger. Both of them claim that external information sources can cause anger, people who are offended want satisfaction. Likewise, the author says that negative behaviors are occurring, people believe that there is almost certainly a negative response. In addition, the authors also pointed out that people are really happy to think ... more content

At first glance there is interest in moral order and self-esteem, but wrath is actually the opposite. It is difficult to express this viewpoint eloquently than Robert C. Solomon's "feelings when writing wrath and meaning of life". - Boss, "oppose" gender members, bullying and authority figures. This is an unbearable inferiority complex, compelling indignation and forcing to adopt a complex strategy. It is designed to prove that everything overcomes the current state, otherwise it is at least equal. Resentment is like a tarantula, a lonely and defensive creature with a bad appearance but no confidence at all. The bite is painful and toxic but rarely fatal; it spends most of its time in or behind the hole. "(Solomon, 1993)