Article 19

On 10th December 1948, the UN General Assembly adopted the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" and announced it. It has been translated into over 350 languages ​​around the world and has more than 100 African languages. Click on the follow-up link to find the full text of that 30 English articles.

Our first principle is a simplification of the form of "We" in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. This is detailed in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 1966, which also sets various legal restrictions on freedom of expression. If you want to know more, the United Nations Human Rights Commission has a very authoritative interpretation of Article 19. In theory, the "treaty" is legally binding in the country that signed and ratified the treaty. Indeed, as we all know, many governments have not fulfilled their strict commitments in most cases, and all governments will not fulfill their promises at certain times. Our first principle also means that we have the right to ask why they violate this first principle.

Articles 19 and 32 guarantee legal equality for all. Article 19 states that the Federal Government may request that the federal government "equalize, regardless of gender, race, nationality, language, origin, property or employment status, place of residence, religious attitude, conviction, members of the public body, We assure rights and freedoms ". Equal access to state services and government participation. Article 22 guarantees the rights of individuals to "freedom and personal force majeure" and the government declares that it can not bind people for 48 hours or more without court order. Article 23 guarantees the right of privacy and stipulates that the government should not infringe the privacy of "communication, telephone communication". . . And other communication is "no order of court

The purpose of Articles 19 and 20 is different and complementary. Article 19 (3) believes that freedom of expression may harm others' rights, reputation, state security, public order or public health or morals. To prevent the loss of life and discrimination. Secondly, there is a big contradiction between Article 20 and the implementation of Article 19 paragraph 3. Article 20 requires that the "treaty" specifically address the country. The law prohibits direct law - perhaps the Penal Code - and Article 19 only allows limited restrictions under certain conditions. . 24 Therefore, the restrictions stipulated in Article 19 are permitted, but the restrictions stipulated in Article 20 are mandatory.