Arthur Dimmesdale and John Proctor's Guilt and Sin

The guilt of Arthur Din Mezdale and John Proctor is a big blow to the human soul. It incorporates our dreams, ideas, and actions. No matter where we are facing it, we are staring at us in white eyes. Suffering is unbearable, but guilt is an emotion to reaffirm our humanity. Repentance is a specific guilt of the spirit, the body, or both, proving that we have transcended the foundation of animal trends. This fact is not ignored by many excellent literary people.

Proctor vs. Dimsdale The characters of "crucible" of Arthur Miller and "Scarlet letter" of Nathaniel Hawthorne, John Procter and Arthur Dimsdale are victims of Puritan, unchanging ethics. These ethics are reflected in ways that are forced to act like others. The role of Hawthorne Arthur Din Mezdale is a typical example of what Puritan should do.

John Procter is the hero of Arthur Miller's "crucible". He was a farmer in Salem, Massachusetts in the 1600s. He was executed when he did not acknowledge magical practice. Ding Mesdale Minister is the hero of Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Red Letter". He bore an illegal child in a sinful relationship and died when he could no longer bear the sin. John Proctor and Dimmesdale Ministers have something in common, but there are some differences.

The guilt of Arthur Din Mezdale and John Proctor is a big blow to the human soul. It incorporates our dreams, ideas, and actions. No matter where we are facing it, we are staring at us in white eyes. Suffering is unbearable, but guilt is an emotion to reaffirm our humanity. Repentance is a specific guilt of the spirit, the body, or both, proving that we have transcended the foundation of animal trends. This fact is not ignored by many excellent literary people.