Aristotle's Analysis

In his era, Aristotle wrote a paper on what he thought should have a perfect tragedy. As a perfect example of how to compare tragedies, he used the work of Sophocles' tragedy "Oedipus the King". Aristotle believes that King Edpsus will follow his six features, the ideal framework for perfect tragedy. He writes like this. Plot, character, language, thought, wonder, and song. "From the perfect example of his interpretation of these six features and the tragedy of Sophocles, Oedipus is found to be perfect. Tragedy

The structure of the play is the structure of dramatic works such as drama and movies. Beginning with Aristotle's poetry (335 BC), many scholars analyzed the structure of the drama. In this article we will analyze the analysis of Aristotle's Greek tragedy and the analysis of Gustav Freitag's ancient Greek and Shakespeare plays. In 1863, a playwright like Henrik Ibsen gave up on a five-story building and tried 3, 4 works, a German playwright and novelist Gustav Fretag wrote Die Technik. Des Dramas, an authoritative research structure of 5 screen dramas. He is listing the pyramids later called Freitag. Under the pyramid of Freitag, the story consists of five parts. Description (originally referred to as introduction), rising behavior (rising), climax, descending behavior (retreat or decline), and end / solution / revelation / disaster

Aristotle criticized Aristotle's analysis of the economic importance of accusations in addition to jagged and sickle-shaped sickle-shaped drugs and did not economically apply his extensive philosophical implicit treatment. But this condemnation missed an important point in Austria - in particular detailed by the Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises of the 20th century - economic theory is part of a broader "behavior" analysis of human behavior It is only. ,part. Through the use of analytical tools for the logical meaning of pursuing the purpose of all human actions, Aristotle has laid the foundation for Austrian pronoun theory and marginal product theory for 2000.

If it is best to forget the proportional equation between the builder and the worker the remaining analysis of Aristotle has been considered by some historians as a precursor to the Austrian economic school. Aristotle clearly pointed out that money represents human needs and needs, provides the driving force of exchange and "combines all." Demand depends on the value or desirability of the product. According to Democritus, Aristotle stated that after the number of goods reached a certain limit, "use too much" plummeted the value of use and it got worthless. But Aristotle points out the other side of the coin beyond Democritus. If the product runs short, it will be more subjective or more valuable. In rhetoric, he pointed out that "rare ones are superior to rich ones, gold is better than iron but not very useful".