Argumentative Essay: Should the Voting Age Be Lowered to Thirteen?

In this article I will explain whether to reduce the voting age to 13 years old. The reason why the age of 13 was chosen was because when the Jewish beliefs said that children would become adults, it was time to start thinking about children becoming more adults.

Generally, it is easy to operate, especially afraid. Because this is because George Bush can do it in two terms rather than cheating him with one person. Young people are easy to operate, increase only fear of the media and pressure to voters

It is unfair to say that it is easy for elderly people and patients with psychiatric disorders to operate younger people and operate them more easily. The real answer is that it means that elderly people and young people can vote more equitably, it is impossible to manipulate voters in any way.

There are no places in the world where groups and people can stop manipulating other people 's groups. Elderly people can operate, but young people are likely to be raised, so we need to wait until we get enough age to vote.

This comes from historical evidence that groups of people tend to stay bad until they appear in some way to the government. Currently, there is no 13-year-old minister or senator, but if young people can vote, they can vote for young people.

Parents' work is to fight for the rights and well-being of children. This is the current case as political candidates tend to respond to "breeders" and tend to provide policies and attitudes to meet the needs of parents and their descendants. There is also the fact that the needs of young people are doubled. Parents still pay attention to the needs of their children, and teenagers also pay attention to their own needs. This doubles the size of the group, which is disproportionate to other groups.

In this article, it is too difficult to derive a conclusion, such as whether parents will influence the voting of children, whether it affects the voting of children, so there are some points that are often overlooked, such as increasing the number of election teams . This article seems to point out the fact that the age of voting should not be lowered.

Suppose you have reserved an age-based eligibility criteria for voting. How old can I be? Consider the argument that the voting age is lowered to 16 years old and its operation will be as follows. 18-year-olds should vote. The ability of a 16 year old child is only much lower than that of an 18 year old child. Therefore, a 16 year old child needs to vote. I will accept the prescriptive premise that an 18 year old child should vote. Furthermore, we assume that the difference in our ability to be awarded between the ages of 16 and 18 is not important. Nonetheless, we can resist the conclusion that a 16 - year - old child should have the right to vote. As far as we know, we can use the same discussion repeatedly. It will be ridiculous until a 6-year-old gets a voting right.

The argument against lowering the voting age to 16 includes the lack of political maturity. On the other hand, one of the main issues of lowering the voting age to 16 is that taxation is unnecessary and political expression because in most countries this age will reach the statutory working age in most jobs and there is an obligation to pay taxes There is no thing. . In the 2000s, states in the United States (including California, Florida, Alaska) proposed several recommendations to reduce voting age, none of them succeeded. Nationwide reductions were proposed in 2005 in New South Wales in Canada and Australia, but these recommendations were not adopted. In May 2009 Denmark parliamentary member Mogens Jensen told the European Commission of Strasbourg to take the initiative to lower the voting age in Europe to 16 years.