Argument

If the audience is hostile and unable to reconcile, please use the Rogerian model. This method is also known as non-face-to-face or WIN-WIN parametric model. This method is used in environments that are labor disputes, international peace treaties, marriage counseling, and other controversial circumstances. Please follow the procedure below.

Discuss issues, interests, and background necessary for readers to understand the discussion

Express this in objective words - your intention is not to hurt the reader, but to educate and verify that you are a theorist correctly understanding the opposite view

It may not be completely objective, but it is an important stage of the process: simply explain why you chose your position.

The "proof" phase of the classic model is the key to success, but the need to find a common ground here is important for the success of Rogerian's approach. What can you and your opponent agree with?

According to the fourth step, develop a solution, learn from the strengths of both sides, and provide negotiation solutions on the way.

Four parts of the claim, claims, counterclaims, reasons and evidence. The assertion is the main argument. A counterclaim is contrary to that claim or objection. One of the reasons why assertions were submitted and supported by evidence. Evidence is a fact or research that supports your claim. I hope that you will win the next discussion!

What kind of discussion is included in the text? How do authors confirm their claim? What kind of evidence does the author use to demonstrate their claim? Discussion to demonstrate the claim is also called evidence. What is the proof that the author must prove? Based on what basic assumption does the discussion support the author's argument? In this case, why do these discussions seem to be related? The connection between argument and assertion is sometimes called an arrest warrant. Another word is a research method (Rienecker, 2012, p. 314). In the above example of dinner, I explained about the guarantee "I must protect my contract." This sentence is implicitly established, but the task of discussion is necessary.

Once discussion is presented, very important assurances are distinguishable. Languages ​​used in parameters can be interpreted as the basis of actual parameters. The styles used represent the role played by persuading the reader to think further about the author's confidence in the claim, their position in the conclusion of the statement, and the assertions presented. The presented assertion gives a possible conclusion of discussion and presents evidence to support the assertion. This is not enough for "complex scientific argumentation" and authors must also create warrants that link evidence and assertions. In general, narratives can be used as a basic guarantee. In this approach, the authors provide detailed information and describe the events and circumstances that can establish relationships between claims reasons.