Argument for Human Cloning

Introduction Cloning is the process of manipulating DNA and embryonic stem cells to create the same organism. The purpose of cloning is to find treatment and reduce human suffering (Rosalyn). Is this wrong? Does it respect nature itself? According to Sir John Gordon, cloning is more than simply copying "what God created by nature" (Gordon) just like God did. This new development establishes a series of arguments since the same process is executed for humans sooner or later if human beings can artificially create mammals.

This brief review first focuses on the scientific evidence of human cloning arguments following "human cloning ethics" in the discussion of Leon Kas cloning human clones. Proliferation and research Clonal cloning is a nuclear transplantation performed by somatic cells of adult animals. In the case of sheep like Dolly, the nucleus of the cells from the sheep are placed in the cells of another sheep excreted from the nucleus. However, unlike the general way of thinking, cloned sheep are not genetically identical to 100% donor sheep.

Since the victory of Crawley Dolly, a laboratory who made sheep in Scotland, succeeded, a controversial global debate about human cloning began. Since the results of Dolly, the medical risks and human rights of the clone, self-esteem, to the threat to individualism There are many moral, ethical concern. But the most important thing of this discussion is not cloning failure, but the result of success. This is a question of quarrel. When cloning becomes a reality, some people think cloning will be tracked and controlled if something happens. This new knowledge has not only risks, costs, and benefits, but also complicated skin tone, as the results may last forever or change nature's evolution as a whole and careful consideration is needed .