Argument Between Science and Religion

Why are reasonable people educated believing in the parties to the discussion when most of the evidence points to other evidence? Discussions between science and religion announced the origin of the species that began at Charles Darwin, everyone has problems, since then the conflict continues: come from people. Where does the earth come from? space. Everything: Following the evolutionary model as Charles Darwin, Charles Darwin and many scientists, and not only answers, but also discovered evidence that evolution is a more rational theory to the next problem.

Rachels pointed out that the argument between science and religion is itself a major setback in theology. Traditional religion absorbs most of its power by interpreting the universe. Darwin advocated the theory of competition, and other answers, especially on the relationship between humans and other animals. "Before Darwin, the understanding of inhumanity is controlled by the world's picture.This picture shows that the gap between human nature and the animal's nature is the same as God in all the build- For his men, he gave his soul, free will, reason and moral judgment as well as other small animals as his biological creation.The background of this picture To make this attribution possible, in order to make the moral quality of any animal belong to the impossible seems impossible, what is needed is to replace different images.

Ian Barber describes four interactions of religion and science in the "religion of the scientific era". These types constitute an increasingly favorable interaction between religion and science. My experience is the interaction of science and religion, but it does not always conform to the neat category, but I found a convenient starting point for them. The competition model assumes that religion and science are one of them, incompatible, as being a legitimate source of knowledge. I am laughing religious feelings for fundamental atheists like Richard Dawkins. For them, religion is an illusion, the only true knowledge is scientific knowledge, which needs to be tested and analyzed objectively. However, Dawkins and others have not admitted having a way of religious belief.