Are there any real-life examples when “The quality of knowledge is best measured by how many people accept it”?

First of all, how do you define 'quality of knowledge'? Most knowledge definitions include expertise and skills based on facts, information, observations, evidence, experience or education. Knowledge can be included in books and other media, once there was an encyclopedia called "book of knowledge". The quality of knowledge can be measured by the extent to which information corresponds to current objective science or reasonably determined facts. Of course, when you notice that we are creating a new invention, useful knowledge will become obsolete and quality will decline. This book: Explain why the half-life of the fact has a deadline even for the best knowledge

I never measure the quality of knowledge, as facts how many people deal with it. Reasonable specific facts such as evolution and the earth are spherical, but most people are accepted. However, many people also accept the fact that only Islam, Christianity, Hinduism or Buddhism are true religions. Knowledge is not determined or measured through opinion poll

"The quality of knowledge is best measured by how many people accept it." For this assertion, see the two AOKs. As a moral evidence, I am trying to find a jury's protest overturning the original erroneous judgment. I was looking for a day, my luck is bad. Is there such evidence from you? Thank you very much.

I never measure the quality of knowledge, as facts how many people deal with it. Reasonable specific facts such as evolution and the earth are spherical, but most people are accepted. However, many people also accept the fact that only Islam, Christianity, Hinduism or Buddhism are true religions. Knowledge is not determined or measured through opinion poll

Is there a realistic example that "the quality of knowledge is best measured by how many people accept it?"

If you answer the question of knowledge, students targeting 9-10 need to think about how this will affect them. Indeed, if the best measure of the quality of moral knowledge is how many people will accept it, this seems to imply that moral knowledge is not fixed; it is most of the people's It relates to the idea. It can also be evaluated for meaning; things that may be true with AoK may not extend to others. Evaluation criteria requires that all answers to the expected grade 5 or higher be clearly defined. With complex concept assignments, the ideas and languages ​​used to represent them quickly become complicated. There are often things that students can express more clearly than writing their own ideas. Therefore, the clear way is to make students record their discussions and to record their ideas verbatim. In addition, my class welcomes any opportunity to stimulate Orwell's politics and English!

When reviewing this problem, I will review the progress of quality measurement. About ten years ago, many doctors did not believe that they can measure the quality of their care, but such attempts are "at best" or, worse, destructive and dangerous. But in the past decade, we saw a big change. We have developed hundreds of quality measurement methods, and doctors complain that the quality measurement method still exists. However, the anxiety about quality measurement has not disappeared, that is why. When asking "quality experts" about good care of diabetic patients they may use the following criteria: excellent hemoglobin A1C control, regular cholesterol check, effective LDL control, smoking cessation Counseling, use of ACE inhibitors or ARB in diabetic patients. Subset But when considering the great clinician I know - do I ask if I can achieve my best hemoglobin A1C control? No