Are the Rich Happy by Stephen Leacock and Homeless by Anna Quindlen

In this discussion, I chose to write by my story articles and Anna Quindlon, "Steven Lee Cock (1916) I wrote for my explanation article" Happy Rich? "" Homeless ". . In this discussion, I intend the comparison / author's purpose to target contrast, spectators, each author is willing to complete the influence that gives the readers articles they wrote. I am also better than stories stories, which plan that the description story shows that it tells the authors point of the view.

The work of Anna Quindlen is called "homeless" and the work of Barbara Ascher gives "sympathy". The prospects of the two authors are very different. Anna Quindlen issued a statement on political issues. The paper states that the philosophy of Quidlen is to have a house, Barbara Asher talks about the poor taking a different approach. Paper is a way for Usher to show to the poor; if they give food and money, will they leave the street? Anna · Quindoln said that many people do not exist without home because there is not any roof over their heads because they are not attached to the phone's place at home. Furthermore, she also said, "Where is the heart of the house?", Or "There is no such place." She thinks everyone should take root. Find places where they go, find peace and feel safe

Anna Quindlen's "homeless" makes people recognize homelessness to influence a wider range of people. She emphasized the homeless personality, the fact that their property is not missing, not only a place to keep them. In this article, it became a homeless big talk with "treasure of Lemon Brown", and it was linked to contribute to the overall theme of social problems. This will lead to research project on homeless. The opportunity "first" (also called "eviction") is Lucille Clifton, a short poem that is offered in another way to contrast and contrast the same type of problem