Are human beings free in this society?

Freedom and coexistence are two major requirements of social life. Freedom and coexistence must support each other

In any case, you can define freedom and coexistence. However, when building a good social system, we must also consider that these two systems are optimal for my system.

You can be as free as limitation of coexistence. As long as we respect coexistence, we can coexist. Coexistence is a bit higher than freedom, but it can not be a lack of balance in society as a whole. Without balance, happiness, humanity, and wisdom (humanity) are absent. Intelligence is a major advantage of mankind and can not be repressed because of coexistence.

Freedom for freedom - freedom alone can not make us what we need. We know how cruel the jungle laws are. We do not want headhunting culture, once again eat meat, or do not allow me to become someone

If you want to know how freely a society is, you can see how the freedom and coexistence are balanced.

The definition of "freedom" of an individual depends only on what the individual wants to do and what disturbs them.

Anyone with a moral sense can not deviate from them. In this respect it is a measure to "fix" people who violate the rules of decision of social voters, so the law will be like "after". If a person breaks these rules or wants to "violate regulations harmless to society", "freedom" is only contradictory to this. That person (or persons) must prove that this is harmless and that the rules have changed. (For example, our marriage law is changing)

Within our thinking, we are also "freedom". We thought to go to the supermarket and select "freely" the goods we found there, but rarely think about why commodities that are not other items are on the shelf. That way, our "free feeling" will suddenly be challenged.

There are people who do not have the concept of "freedom" like those who rely on others for thinking and making decisions for them.

The reason why humans must shift from economics to digital economics is that we want to shift humanity from the necessity of economic function to individuals, beauty and freedom of group society so that people trust each other It is the desire of. To achieve the greatest happiness of people in this society, we speak openly about the decision most likely to be done by people (or society) - according to data

In order to prosper in a free society it is necessary to return to the absolute foundation of humanity. We need to understand human nature accurately. Man is a unique species in nature and its life is dominated by everyone's free will and personal conceptual consciousness. Unlike other creatures, human survival and prosperity depends on recognition at the concept level. People are unique species, due to their individual character, with a clear nature.

Human society (family, tribe and nation) is both natural and traditional. Their nature can be seen anywhere where humans live on the earth. However, the dramatic change in the structure of these natural societies shows the origin of reason and choice. As tradition, they can be natural as long as bee nests and termite colonies can be used to mean something other than instinctively determined.

Praise for humanity in Rousseau's natural state may be one of the most misunderstood views in his philosophy. Human beings are born as good people, "noble barbarians" do not have a habit of annoying humans in civil society, but Rousseau does not simply say that humans in the natural world are good. In addition, he does not insist on returning to the state of nature, but even his contemporaries like Voltaire will give this view to him. The people in their natural state are immoral creatures, neither good nor evil. After humans leave the natural state, they can enjoy the higher forms of goodness, moral goodness, Rousseau expresses it most clearly in social contracts.