Are Democratic States More Peaceful?

Democracy is considered to be more peaceful because "democracies do not attack each other". Democracy does not generalize the idea of ​​fighting each other (or rarely, but there are many changes to this). Since the 1983 Michael Doyle paper pointed out that liberal democracy never warned against other democracy, scholars have regarded pacifism as democracy. . Democratic peace advocates encouraging people to achieve a new era of international peace.

Some of the early studies investigated democratic governments and social characteristics that influence the direction and behavior of the general foreign policy of the country. Regardless of how governed, the claim that democracy is more peaceful in relation to all nations is called a one-dimensional version of democratic peace offer. Empirical evidence supports this argument, but it is not as strong as the evidence accumulated to support the democratic peaceful argument focusing on the interaction between the two countries. Recently, scholars have begun studying systematic democratic peace, in which the proportion of democratic countries in the international system influences the legitimacy of the democratic system and the use of military power in the international community.

The concept of democratic peace must be distinguished from the idea that democratic countries are generally more peaceful than undemocratic countries. The latter argument is controversial, but it is widely thought by international scholars and practitioners that the idea that democracy is not fighting against each other is true. A supporter of democratic peace can trace to the closest American President with German philosopher Emmanuel Conde. In the war message issued to Congress in 1917, Woodrow Wilson declared that the United States aims to make the world "safer for democracy".

Whether democracy leads to peace is not merely an academic concern. For decades, international actors have sometimes supported democratization, as making the country more democratic is believed to at least make them more peaceful with each other. On the contrary, policy critics believe that spreading democracy is a foolish use because of the cost and danger of trying to democratize other countries, as democracy will not lead to peace There. In this article we will consider whether democracy brings peace. It is divided into three parts. First, it explained the empirical model that democracy never fought almost never, and proposed the main theoretical argument that democracy might lead to peace.