Arbitrary Hierarchies

According to Hebrew and Christian poetry, God's wisdom is considered the ultimate, and the prophets are the means by which this wisdom is conveyed to people. But what constitutes God's choice. Whether the prophet is spiritually superior to ordinary people. Are some of the prophets more powerful than other prophets, or do God actually allocate the same amount of power to all the prophets? In other words, if a hierarchy exists, whether it exists or not depends on what an individual or God orders him / her to deal with.

What I am going to do in this article is to make it a bit clearer through a somewhat arbitrary hierarchy. Part of it is inspired by the OSI model which abstractly describes the communication function of the computing system. Using this model, we are trying to summarize how to infer software engineering and how to build software. Each layer is built on the previous layer, but the attributes displayed on the upper layer are independent of the lower layer, so they are independent. In other words, learning of lower layers does not necessarily guarantee acquisition of upper layers, and vice versa.

Traditionally the general image is a natural step located on the head of a human being where various species of animals are consecutively a natural step occupying a higher step. However, instead of using this arbitrary level, it seems more effective to understand cognitive ability as adapting to different niches (see Shettleworth (1998), Reznikova (2007)). Regardless of whether it is fair or not, animal performance is often compared to human performance in cognitive tasks. Naturally, our nearest relatives, apes, tend to behave like humans. In birds, crows and parrots often work well in human-like work. In some chapters, it has also been proven to have many more advanced skills such as how to use the tool, but the number of crowded intelligence studies is still limited.