Appearance

As long as everyone can remember, people already made a decision and judged others about various things, including appearance. Appearance says a lot of our personal and collective people. Regardless of what people believe, whether we are right or not, how we dress and present ourselves, who we are and what we do I will tell you what kind of existence. In the workplace, the appearance is as important as the knowledge of the site. Every day we are told to wear this part and convey the correct message, but what part do you want to wear and tell what?

This is the appearance of this. look. Sophistry is a series of complicated simulations with the sole purpose of "thinking and considering it as a typical neurological way" is the same way that I communicate with others. Because of our interference, we need to make the same things as ours, because that is the only model we have to use. This is a problem for me and my son. I think his autism is like me. When I noticed that his emotional intelligence was far beyond me, I had to understand that his ability exceeded my ability. I told my wife his development, but as a typical person he is more likely to be related to his thinking process than I am.

The appearance is a dialectic of form and content, in other words the form and content are "the essence of appearance". Appearance is the first of all of the existence of truth that is realized as an essential relationship. The appearance develops in the process and forms various shapes, but all of them are contradictory to the content. The emergence of capitalism is money and money, which creates money in the form of interest-bearing capital Wages are clearly "fair wage for days of fair work", market-to-human rules, people in the form of products It is a relation of goods. All appearances in the form of real content, real fantasies,

Is the commodity fetishism appearance or reality? For Marx superstition is apparent, but it is not merely an illusion but gradually disappears by understanding its mysterious nature. Product fetishism is ridiculous on the one hand, and on the other hand how it actually appears and forms, for example, as long as capitalism continues, the form of "bourgeois" economics is accurate. Elegant economists who are "fetish admirers" may be accused of accepting a true figure. In many cases Marx regards fetishism as a misunderstanding and thinks that the exchange value of goods is an analytical error. Thus, for example, money is inexplicable and dazzling, and if you unravel the mystery of the product form, this mystery disappears. Others think people are actually the same as their equivalent labor force, but they do not understand it.