Anti-Voucher Point of View

The idea of ​​the counter voucher school coupon seems like a good idea for children to receive the best education until the problem is analyzed more closely. In fact, this system hurt more children than the children they are helping with. People who do not support the use of vouchers believe that by taking money from a failed public school system, it has led to a decline in the educational level of children in public schools. Since new initiatives such as 'Do not leave children' campaign and rising demand for teachers and children emerged, there is no room to reduce funds (Traub 13).

Pianta immediately pointed out that the study was not an evaluation of the coupon program. Since private schools are considered to be the best choice for credential supporters, the investigation is clearly related to the discussion. However, in the UVA survey, it is pointed out that in the study on the existing voucher program, there is little provision for concrete evidence that private school education will produce better scholastic outcomes. The UVA study is not the first study on the question about the so-called benefits of private school education. Pianta and Ansari cite the study of his wife Sarah Theule Lubienski, a researcher at the University of Illinois who collaborated with the researcher Christopher Lubienski of Indiana University and the advantages of public schools in 2013. In this book Lubienskis uses two domestic datasets and concludes that public schools are actually superior to mathematics education at private schools given socio-economic factors.

Krug is against the idea of ​​choosing schools, ie withdrawing money from the public school system and redirecting it to private schools and primary schools through voucher systems. In most cases, the voucher beneficiary is a parent who can pay private school tuition fees without vouchers. Why do I need to obtain funds from public schools until public schools are limited to universal service for students with different needs? It seems like a plan for us. From now until March 20, please see CD 4 for the signature that needs to include your name on the ballot even if other Democrats are not interested in the Board of Education. If you want to bring clipboard for Tim, please contact him through his Facebook page to get a petition.

In November 2000, Tim Draper's voucher system was included as a proposal 38 on the California ballot paper. The rare thing about the proposal of school vouchers is that the school does not have to accept a voucher or prove the necessary proof. Family application; it does not require the school to accept as a full payment of the voucher, and there are no other provisions to guarantee the actual cost of reducing private school tuition. The measured value is calculated from the final ratio as 70.6 to 29.4