Anti-Theme Writing

To eliminate the existence of thematic writings, all writers in the world of thematic writings unite. Everyone who can read and write must unite contrary to the teaching and diffusion of the target writing disease. Writing the theme interferes with the insight and creativity of the people of the world and they must constantly be repressed by their efforts to receive education and be deprived of their very important ability and thinking skills It will not. Over the centuries the world has been divided into three categories, boring students, students, and illiterates.

The theme of anti-fear opposes the theme of courage. Self-doubt vs. theme against self-confidence theme. Honest subjects are dishonestly opposed. In this way, the subject argument can be expressed as simple ideological duality: COURAGE vs. FEAR, CONFIDENCE vs. SELF - DOUBT, HONESY vs. DISHONESTY. To show a more concrete example, Chinatown links the value of integrity with the value of fraud. Flying over cuckoo's nest once showed a fight between individualism and integration. In "Godfather", the character suffered from a predicament between moral idealism and moral practice. These two ideological aspects are debated through the movement of the body of the story to determine which is better, which is stronger, which brings victory and which fails.

Metaphorically, subjects and anti-subjects have a body of characters that forces them to bid themselves. If the theme of the story is the subject of justice and rebellion, then some personality will be metaphorically by the spirit of injustice. Because they fight for an unfair 'team', each victory of these characters will also be an anti-theme victory. At the same time, other personality is also implied by the spirit of justice. Consistent with the Justice team, each victory of these characters will also be a victory for the theme value. In this way, the character actively participates in the topic debate without knowing himself. This turns the ideological battle into a physical battle. Moral or moral argument gives substance through the role of conflict