Analyzing Walter Horatio Pater´s Aesthetic Criticism

Walter Horeshawpet offered art critics given some very appropriate advice on what constitutes the true beauty of aesthetics in the overall schema of aesthetic criticism. Through his own experience, we and the sensory impressions have found out what formulas are described as beautiful, not existed, according to Pater, thus stated, we say that the object itself is it In this way, taking this into consideration, art critics must first find the impression of beauty and happiness, the source of their interests.

Walter Pater (1839-1894) has completed his work on middle Pater, Renaissance (1873), which has an article about the 18th century art historian Johan Winkelman (Johann Winkelman) Dole was the first 102- ("Affinity with the culture of Greece is just intellectual, there is no subtle clue to his temperament, but the enthusiastic friendship proved this point through his love affair with the young man". 103 pages). Pate brought Winkler's taste to homosexual desires and became the most influential representative of Oscar Wilde. Finally, the term "estate" became synonymous with "homosexuals".

In the second half of the century, in contrast to previous concerns about science, culture and religion, the development of the aesthetic movement came out in the belief of "art of art". The campaign is centered on Walter Pate's "Preface of History". Renaissance (1873) was written after a trip to Italy, and Pete was impressed with the energy and sensuality of Italian culture and Renaissance art. Aesthetic move believes that the purpose of life will change because the absolute character of religion and morality is relative and variable. According to aesthetics by Pater, according to the aesthetic, "I have not experienced the result, but experience itself" I write that it is necessary to pursue it because my life is so short, immersed in a really living "ecstasy experience", the best The fact that you will enjoy the freedom to enjoy the priority of "beauty" is drawing attention. Albert J.

Walter Horeshawpet offered art critics given some very appropriate advice on what constitutes the true beauty of aesthetics in the overall schema of aesthetic criticism. Through his experience, we and the sensory impressions have found out what formulas described as beautiful things that do not exist, according to Pater, according to this we can say that this idea Consider and "see the object itself is it." Art critic should find the source of their interest, ie beauty and happiness.

Even replacing reality with vision, I feel happy (Donoghue, Walter Pater 152-53). UPDICK letters, Sami Paterter needs to know what all artists and critics have aesthetic: (Peter XXI) "Moving by the presence of deeply powerful beautiful objects." Aesthetic critics, each one. This effect is more or less special or unique, as a powerful and intense fun feeling ", such as paintings, artists as to whether trees or humans, these items" for yourself, "but for others In addition to providing these comments in languages ​​other than the purpose of the objective, I hope that by analyzing that he felt that he was in his attention to his thoughts and reducing it to that element (Xxiv). From asking the articles to improve happiness, from the initial perception of the subjective impression to the complete representation of the whole organization (Donohue 153) In order to keep happy, they "finally succumb to the idea of ​​participation did". Petwa!