Analyzing Methods of Achieving Peaceful Coexistence

Ashutosh Varshney (2001) began discovering the relationship between communication and ethnic conflict in multi ethnic society between his analysis, ethnic conflict and civil society, India and other people. He listed a structural definition of ethnic conflict and its counterparts, conducted comparative studies on various Indian religious groups, and effectively conveyed his findings. This paper will clarify the main problem of Varshney, the basis of his research, present his conclusion, determine his research method, and further analyze the importance and effectiveness of his field survey .

- Our peaceful and popular youth revolution is based on the principles of freedom, democracy, human rights, freedom of speech and press, peace, coexistence of humans, fight against corruption and organized crime, war against terrorism, resistance to violence, It shows that extremism and dictatorship are the values ​​of common interests of human beings, ideals, demands, and goals are cherished by the international community as a whole. These will never be subdivided selectively or cancelively due to differences in human characteristics or sovereignty requirements.

Culture and education can not be regarded as the basis for building peace in ideology but at the same time we can not hold common human achievements of the humanities sciences working to achieve reconciliation and peaceful coexistence. In this regard, the diverse cultural heritage of our world suffered from shameless terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, Timbuktu, Libya, Iraq, Syria and religious intolerance and uneducated supporters of ignorance in particular I point out that. When I heard about the incident in Syria who worked as an ambassador, I felt very pain personally. There, I was able to deepen personal understanding of his legacy through an ancient city like the open air museum. It reflects a wonderful history. Civilization of human beings such as Aleppo, Holmes, Palmyra. Also, when I see being destroyed today and robbing of their huge wealth, I feel very sad.

As the Soviet people saw, it is impossible to achieve a fair and democratic world without public social liberation. The Soviet Union's struggle to alleviate international tensions and aim for peaceful coexistence with a system different from the state does not mean deviation from the principle of foreign policy. Kissinger himself was always like this. I am impatient with the problems of the "intention" and "final goal" of the Soviet Union. It is very important for theorists and military intelligence personnel. As Truman, Acheson, and his military advisers made early in the postwar period, I would like to know if any new movements are "the premise of a global confrontation", but that is "related." Instead, people have to look at the practices of the Soviet Union.