Analyzing McTaggart's Theory of Time

John McGratt submitted a fundamental argument to his article "Time", arguing that time is not true. This discussion is very interesting and attracting a lot of attention, but I still do not believe in the arguments he advocated. In this article we use McTaggart's discussion aspect to critically analyze the reason why McTaggart's discussion is considered to have failed and to explain McTaggart's discussion on illegal time while presenting another point of time I will. The following is an explanation about McGagat's viewpoint. Mctagget wants to prove that time does not exist.

Broad has built a philosophical analysis that can safely extend the box theory and fight McGratt's time inequality. In his theoretical composition he concludes that time can not exist by analyzing statements describing future events such as "the sun will rise to the east." In summary, this is a plausible assumption. From a compatibility point of view, Broad said that by saying that it is realistic, we must include certain parts of reality to attack this universal concept. However, based on the extension box theory, this description has nothing to do with actual facts. It means that time has reached this point, it is not so. Each statement about the future can deduce two types of statements, the future and the future. Based on the extension box theory, these statements can not be associated with real facts, so they can neither be true nor exist.

J. M. E McTaggart and C. D Broad believe that it is the theory of compatibility truth, but in the argument that time exists objectively. As a compatriot, they believe that for a particular thing it must conform to certain facts of the universe. McTaggart thinks that any description can not be regarded as truth, as each interpretation is contradictory, infinitely recessed or inappropriate. McTaggart draws A series witches in their intuitive sense through the philosophical analysis of human perception of time, disassembles them into the past and present and the future, and secondly as discussed earlier in the second I will draw. Time series. Broad answered McTAG Gart's view that time can not exist by proposing extended block theory. This theory is a reality between the past and the present, but the future suggests that it is not the case

The philosophical analysis of the A series and B series completed by McGagat gave him the necessary reason to call it "no reality of time". Traditionally, we talk about time as if there are past, present and future. McTaggart insists that when trying to explain a point in time it will lead to an infinite loop of regression. When explaining the past, the present, or the future, you need to refer to different sets of present and future. These can only be understood as existing as a set of different paths or future moments, leading to an infinite regression loop. Furthermore, through a similar philosophical analysis, we discovered that there is a conflict between present and future if there is a past. In the B series, McTaggart claims that change will be necessary over time. However, according to McTaggart, this is self-contradictory because there is no change even when talking about time.