Analysis of Wing Safety Using Full-Range Leadership Model

Within the last 8 months, this wing experienced a series of terrible security incidents, which resulted in multiple deaths or serious injuries. Unfortunately, service members and families are identified as root cause. As a new director of the Wing Security office, this is my top priority. I can not solve this problem by myself and will depend heavily on my team. This article explains how to use the full range leadership model (FRLM) to analyze the current environment and plan to build them using the same model.

A comprehensive leadership model is one way to understand the style of leadership. The omni-directional model includes innovative leadership, trading leadership, and laissez-faire leadership, but since leaders who are primarily indicators of laissez-faire leadership are often evaluated as inefficient It also shows effectiveness. (Bass & Riggio, 2006). The omnidirectional leadership model represents nine factors. Five changes, two trades, two laissez-faire leadership factors. These are clearly separated into multifactor leadership questionnaire or MLQ subscale (Antonakis, Avolio, Sivasubranamiam, 2003). . In the holistic leadership model, it is assumed that each leader shows some degree of leadership style to some extent (Bass & Riggio, 2006). MLQ measures leadership behavior and identifies the most common leadership style (Bass & Riggio, 2006)

The all-round leadership model is probably the most effective leadership model in the world today. The originality of the All-Round Leadership (FRL) model lies in the concept of "scope" leadership behavior that all leaders present. This model requires a shift in leadership behavior shifting from more trading leaders to transformation. Leadership style Bath (1999) is one of the researchers who discussed the shift to leadership trading. The scholars studied the omnidirectional leadership model (FRL) as a predictor of various outcomes in the employee organization. Commitment, employee satisfaction, motivation, organizational efficiency and performance (Base and Stogdill, 1990; Barbuto et al., 2007)