Analysis of The Singer Solution to World Poverty by Peter Singer

St. Augustine said once, "Know the amount God has given you, you get what you need, the rest are what others need." Peter Singer expressed Augustine's responsibility to help people who are not as lucky as they are in their article "Singer solves the world's poverty problem". Singer agrees with his idea that people living in luxury goods should support those who survive in poverty. The singer adopted the role of philosophical utilitarian philosopher who judged the morality of his behavior based on the result of their behavior.

"Singer solves the problem of poverty in the world" Author: Peter Singer "New York Times" magazine article "Life solves the world's poverty", Professor of bioethics Professor Peter Singer, in the food world Announced calling attention to the urgent need of food and medicine Many places Singers donate all funds to UNICEF or Oxfam and other foreign aid organizations, wealthy people are not required for basic life requirements I believe it should be. "This formula is simple - you should give up on whatever you do not need, that you spend on luxury goods." Please write an article that evaluates the pros and cons of Singer's claim. Use appropriate evidence when checking each party and show you a more convincing place. c) Generosity is a good thing and therefore we can teach our children to change our offspring b) We can live a comfortable life and abandon the idea of ​​rich and poor people I can do it. 2. Disadvantages: a) Many Americans work hard for money

In the article 'Singers solve world poverty problems', philosopher Peter Singer is trying to solve poverty problems. Singer thinks that source income is equivalent to starving and deathing children. Therefore, singer believes that the moral point of eliminating world hunger is to abandon daily luxury. Donating a lot of money can help children at stake of death and hunger, but Singer's assertions are not only unrealistic, but also every day responsible for themselves Americans are also overly strict.