Analysis of the Article: "Reading in a Whole New Way" by Kevin Kelly

In "Reading in a new way", Kevin Kelly pointed out that the digital screen is illuminating our lives. He emphasized that the digital screen changed the way we see the world. Kelly tried to convince the audience that today's society relies heavily on new technologies to further improve reader comprehension skills. He outlined how the reading behavior changed. Kelly 's rhetorical choice helped convince the audience that digital screens are becoming dependent on people. Reading behavior has changed; people tend to read more for advances in technology.

A way laughed at another night, I asked the students to read the famous article by Bruce "better than human: the reason the robot can do our work and take it" I explained. "Yes, robots are terrible, they will take on all of our work!" I said, "We are a robot assigned to solve the DARPA 's" rescue "challenge It is just bad to have the same physical plan as a human being. They are a huge "big dog" Boston robot style box. When the robot turned the handle of the door and tried to fall to a metal hip, everyone laughed and got off the bus, another robot collapsed to his side. Wait a second. The final winner of the challenge seen in the second half of NOVA's episode is clearly the only one with a different body plan and design methodology.

Kevin Kelly 's new book, published in the same year as Jaron Lanier' You are not a gadget 'is appropriate. Kelly and Lanier oppose the difference between Internet optimists and pessimists, but they took a thoughtful but sometimes controversial approach to the impact of technology on society. I thought these two books were very interesting, but from time to time I became extremely uneasy. For example, in Ranier's book I commented in January, it included excellent criticism of extreme change technology, utopianism, he named it "totipotency of cybernetics". Lanier accepts the idea of ​​some optimists in the extreme digital age where "honeycomb mind" or "Noosphere" comes. He strongly appreciates personality and presents a strong reason to be cautious when it is too enthusiastic or quasi-religious when adopting technology. However, Rania's criticism is too thorough, his view of the world is too depressed.