Analysis of Seping-Anderson Three Worlds of the Welfare Capitalism

Based on these two principles, he derived three different types of welfare state power type. He distinguishes the Liberal Party, the Christian Democratic Party (Conservative Party) and the Social Democratic Party. In addition, he distinguishes between commoditization and demodify. This has created continuity that can be placed in different types of countries. An outline of this continuum is shown in Figure 1. Linguistically, this may be due to the type of social democratic welfare state based on the principle of universalism.

In a broad sense, the welfare state is universal - it covers everything or is selective - only the one that is deemed to need the most assistance. In his book "Three Worlds of Capitalism in Wealth" published in 1990, Danish sociologist Gøsta Esping-Andersen further identified three subtypes of welfare state model. These classifications are still being used as a starting point for the analysis of contemporary welfare states and are still basic heuristic tools for scholars of welfare states. Even for those who claim that a close analysis of individual cases is more appropriate to capture the complexity of arrangements of different social policies, the type of profit will provide comparative prospects to aid individual prospects I can. : 598

Esping-Anderson (1990) pointed out that in his breakthrough research "The Three Worlds of Asset Capitalism", expenditure-based classification "all expenditures are equal." Of course, the level of funds allocated by the government for welfare provisions is very important when classifying the country, but its use affects the conditions, even if the levels of expenditure are similar, there is a large gap between welfare states It brings about a difference. First of all, in countries like Austria, the government "accounts for the majority of the welfare of privileged civil servants," Esping-Anderson says. "It is usually not considered to be a commitment to social citizens and solidarity." Furthermore, in expenditure analysis, for example, ignoring whether profits are investigated by economic situation or universality There are often.

In the main and most influential study of Esping Andersen's "The World of Three Welfare Capitalism", he pointed out that the decommissioning measures and social stratification of a country is an important issue in the assessment of welfare states . These two are also called key indicators as a measure of the quality of the provided welfare state. From this point of view, the first indicator is that non-remodeling is actually the degree to which social services are offered to people in the country without depending on the market to some extent as rights and personal livelihoods. (Pierson and Castles, 2006). Different types of welfare countries provide different levels of decommissioning measures to their citizens. As another index, social stratification is the extent to which a welfare state distinguishes different social groups based on, for example, occupational status and sex (Cochrane et al., 2001).