Analysis of New Social Movement Theory

Silent analysis of New Social Movement Theory In the discussion of New Social Movement (NSM) theory by Johnston, Laraña, and Gusfield, we considered this concept to be a "double-edged sword" as they are related to change . . The social form emphasizes the novelty of the model, but recognizes and evaluates the similarity between them, and has little to do with the previous social movement theory, rather than integrating useful ones in the past theory there is not.

The term New Social Movement (NSM) is the theory of social movements trying to explain the new movement (ie, post industrial economy) that appeared in the societies of Western countries since the mid-1960s. It departed greatly from the paradigm of traditional social movements. Aberle's Four Types of Social Movement: New Social Movement (NSM) is a social movement theory that seeks to explain the excessive new movements commonly seen in various Western societies since the mid-1960's (later sought It is said that). The industrial economy is quite different from the traditional social movement paradigm.

There are two important arguments in the NSM theory. First of all, the rise of the post industrial economy is the reason for the new round of social movements. Secondly, these movements are very different from previous industrial economies and social movements. The main difference is their goal. Because the new movement is not about materialistic qualities such as economic happiness, it concerns human rights issues (such as gays' rights and pacifism). The most striking feature of the new social movements is that they are mainly social and cultural, followed by politics. The new social movements are separated from workers' movements and this is the core of the acquisition of citizenship and the political goals of representatives of the working class, through cultural innovation, development of new lifestyles, through transformation of identity I concentrate on realizing social mobilization.

Resource mobilization theory (RM) treats formal organizations, not individuals, as the core of social movements analysis. Abramovitz (2010) describes the official social movement organization (SMO) "Explain the goals of the broader social movement and convert it to political behavior" "Complex, centralized, formal and highly developed specialization House "group. 208) There may be many social movements in specific social movements that promise to mobilize organizations and bring about change, including the "social sports industry" (McCarthy & Zald, 1977). Organizations involved in resource mobilization are reasonable