Analysis of Moral Luck Views of Aristotle and Epictetus

An analysis of the moral luck of Aristotle, the founder of Western science and Epitetus, one of the greatest stoics, has their theory of "moral luck". In order to have the basic idea of ​​this subject, we should explain it from a non-philosophical point of view. After doing this we can compare the views of Aristotle and Epictetus and use the example of "Into Thin Air" (ITA) written by Jon Krakauer to distinguish them.

Aristotle, the founder of Western science and Epitectus, one of the greatest stories, has a theory about "moral luck". In order to have the basic idea of ​​this subject, we should explain it from a non-philosophical point of view. After doing this we can compare the views of Aristotle and Epictetus and use the example of "Into Thin Air" (ITA) written by Jon Krakauer to distinguish them. If moral morality is explained from a general point of view, it is an act that results from luck and leads to moral purpose. The moral purpose I am talking to is related to moral or moral values. In general, moral luck involves praise and accusation, review of responsibility, and all issues related to our uncontrollable things, such as birthplace, parents, nationality. They all have this common structure, but Aristotle and Epitectus have different arguments about moral luck.

Aristotle asked moral luck "What influence does our control can have on our responsibility?" Examples of Christopher 's moral luck. Perspectives Two main types of Aristotle's spontaneous behavior and involuntary behavior need to be considered here. There are three main reasons for voluntary action. Fear of evil, fear of a certain high purpose, and fear of ignorance. ITA can analyze these behaviors and find many examples of analyzing moral luck by doing it. For our purposes, I would like to analyze the two situations of the ITA. Decide to overcome the death of Mount Everest and Rob Hole