Analysis of Joel L. Swerdlow’s 2001 Essay, “Changing America"

In an article on 'Change in America' an interview with Joel L. Swerdlow, in 2001, he wrote about the cultural differences of high school students today. He went to talk about ways to collect children widely from all over the world, but they still have several ways to have the same "American boys" attitude towards life there is. In this article, people explain how to refer to the United States as the "crucible" of the country, and over time, this view began to change. The foundation of the United States is changing. The past revolution is a new way to live in this country.

September 11, 2001, there have been several changes in the United States. Beating a twin tower, still a frightening to maintain it as a multicultural, democratic society of freedom identity still - on September 11, the United States may be one of its symbols. Samuel · Pantin Dayton (Samuel · H · Huntington) of the "crowding of civilization" where the thesis was heard was a mocking concept by many scholars "democracy is the end of history" but the United States opened to the world Leave it down, I still believe it Can change the world. With diligence, diplomacy, pure charm, I have my own image

Analyze their television viewing habits, suggesting that the nature of the media divide in the United States will change, but if that is not the size. If he or she does not see the Academy Awards or "Will and Grace", in 2001, you can predict a conservative person. By 2009, these cultural symbols have been replaced by three Fox News programs: "Hannity and Ke Musi" "O'Reilly Factor", "" Fox and Friends "

We can purchase to use to predict our politics, race and education - sometimes more than 90% correct answer rate

Joel Kotkin is an important factor lacking in "changing the demographics of the United States", the impact of climate change is that the United States will produce 2050 years. He hoped that for the next 40 years, climate change will come to the gathering of US immigrants, which will inevitably impact the inevitable consequences as a result in every aspect of life, which is necessary in the future. Kotkin seems to ignore it, I think the problem will disappear: if he talked about the role of immigrants in the fight against the greatest threats he can play our planet, then, He is certainly a stronger argument than to philosophy. His future multicultural dream world