Analysis of Hermann Haring´s Religion: A Source of Violence

Under the name of peace under the name of overcoming violence of religion (Christianity and Muslim) violence and trying to overcome violence under the name of religion, under the name of religion, he is of violence Focusing on the concept and the role of religion: as Hermann Haring, religion as a source of violence. All religions recognize violence and killing is not acceptable, but when religion is questioned or refuted, violence is used as a means to protect its authenticity and reliability. Violence is no longer an acceptable means to mediate a dispute.

Anthropologist Jack David Eller argues that the religion itself is not violent and he considers "Religion and violence are clearly compatible, but they are not the same." He thinks " Violence against religion is both necessary and unique, "and almost all forms of religious violence are inevitable consequences of that non-religion." In addition, he said religion "We believe that groups may be more like flags, rather than actual problems between them". By integration of both sides of the discussion, photographed John Teehan position. He said, "We will preserve the traditional religious reaction," Isolate the religion, what kind of regional religion's names and their supporters do "Teehan" This kind of attitude of religious violence Although it may be understandable, but it can not eventually endorse, we have hindered any useful insight into religion and religious violence. "

In Hermann Harings, religion is the source of violence, overcoming violence under the name religion, trying to overcome violence under the name religion. All religions recognize violence and killing is not acceptable, but when religion is questioned or refuted, violence is used as a means to protect its authenticity and reliability. Violence is no longer an acceptable means to mediate a dispute.

According to Girard's theory, criticism of religion and violence Carwan, in particular referring to modern martyrdom, analyzed the theory mentioning his religion and violence, abolition of sacred violence. Carwin believes that for many religiously diverse societies, this is a very problematic person has been a very strong Christian foundation. But if the view of Karwan correctly understands, the religious idea is that there is no need to offend Girardian and non-Christians to abolish violence. From this starting point, an interesting discussion on possible ways similar to wisdom bills' way of extreme Islamic Jihad and Shahid martyrdom and explanation explanations that come to violence and sacred false introduced "abolition." Islam It is believed to be widely believed not to be lost as an interpretation tool, so this is not just a wishful observation