An Oedipal Relationship in Beneix's Diva

Jean - Jacques Beneix 's Diva Jules and Cynthia Hawkins' relationship is a very complex and ambiguous Oedipus. For Jules, the heroine represents the perfection of the music, and he loves her completely. But he and her relationship are a little mother. Joule's obsession with Shinless Hawkins was quite unhealthy and he infringed on her purity. But despite his mistake, her attitude towards her mother allowed for reconciliation. From the beginning of the movie, the voice of Cynthia Hawkins has penetrated everything.

The edeps complex is consistent with the penile stage of infant's sexual development, but is derived from the stage before the edeps dominated by the relation between the child and the mother, and completes the whole fantasy of Edipsus with its own identity I hope that. And mother, the first fantasy love object. It is the mother who helps to give special value to the penis by obviously wanting one of his fathers. We assume that both small boys and small girls have self-love about the penis and everything living (and inanimate) has something that includes a mother.

For mothers, attachment of mother-in-law will continue the important period of the girl's early sexual development. There is no big difference between the relationship with Edep's father and attachment to Edepus' mother. For this reason it is believed that Freud believes it is more important than male development, the previous Edipus stage plays an important role in female sexual development. For this reason, Freud withdrew his central position at the late stage of research (1931). In other words, the edepsis stage is the core of neurosis that determines the pre-edepsis stage. It played a greater role in this process. As Freud often notices in his writing, he considers male sexual development to be relatively well understood, but her sexual condition and her development at all stages is problematic for him They are more complicated and buried in "fog and shadows". It is not easy to get the previous Edips, the analysis (Floyd 1977, p. 373)