An Interpretation of What Work Is

Interpretting the work Richard Hugo once wrote, "I believe that Philippe Levin knows something so that he can not forget these things when writing poetry." The theme of Levin's work comes from his past experience that he grew up working during the Second World War. Philip Levin was brought up in America in Detroit, Michigan in this very difficult time. His attention is full of warfare and afraid of being sent abroad, his attention is not focused on something like poetry.

One of Scott's important messages to the world is "What can not you do?" This is mainly explained in the world of work and profession, but my explanation is that there is nothing you can do for every aspect of life? Work hard to develop whether it is spiritual work, to develop your relationships, to improve your health, to live a rich life, to follow your dreams, and more. Okay, you have achieved a legend very well. It is exactly the same as your values ​​and beliefs.

Artistic interpretation means that meaning belongs to the work. I can not agree if the intention of the artist and the intention of the writer are related to interpretation of the work. In the British and American analysis of art philosophy, the view on interpretation is divided into two major camps. Intentionally and anti-intentionally, at first focuses on art, that is, literature. Anti-intentionists argue that the meaning of the work is entirely dependent on language and literary customs, thereby rejecting the relevance of the author's intention. The basic assumption of this position is that the work has autonomy on meaning and other aesthetically relevant attributes. Non-text elements such as author's intention are neither necessary nor sufficient for determining meaning. This initial position in traditional analysis is often referred to as traditionalism, as it emphasizes conventions.

But this is not the only way to explain Star Wars. In this case, the intention of author Lucas is clearly the interpretation of literary works and movie works. However, the author's intention does not solve the problem of all that means. Suppose that the intention of the author is that the only legitimate interpretation of the work is to make a deliberate mistake. Lucas's perspective is only one of a series of possible ways to explain and understand the information and ideology underlying the novel.