An Argument in Favor of Legalizing Marijuana

"There are about 100,000 people sucking marijuana in the US, but most of them are blacks, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers whose Satan music, jazz, and swing are caused by marijuana, black people, The entertainer has sex, anyone else. "Harry J. Anslinger (then Director of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration) told the Congress in 1937 to persuade Congress to pass marijuana, He said that it was used with people. building. Because of pure ignorance, marijuana became illegal in the United States in 1937, the government incompetent, and personal progress.

The theoretical arguments behind the legalization of cannabis often ignore the practical problem of the way drugs are regulated and sold. Of course, depending on the implementation details, the impact of legalization on families, schools, and communities will be determined. Most fundamentally, how and when is marijuana sold? The Federal Government currently accepts Medical Cannabis Pharmacies but because it does not tolerate mass sales under general legal regulations the most likely result is that drugs are sold at legitimate stores at all It is not to be done. So marijuana will continue to be sold on gray or black market.

The most attractive argument for supporting legalization of marijuana is the increase in tax that it will bring to the Canadian economy. The legalization of marijuana provides an important advantage over the ban as it allows the government to tax illegal drugs. In particular, the high demand for Canadian entertainment marijuana suggests that legalization of this medicine will generate tremendous taxes. Free market prices for cannabis are estimated to be particularly low except for taxes. This allows the government to impose higher taxes on marijuana while keeping the price at a competitive level with other narcotics such as alcohol and tobacco22.

Legislate and regulate Canadian Cannabis: Review of potential economic, social and health effects

One argument for legalizing marijuana is the ability to sell taxes. For example, after January 5, 2015, sales of cannabis in Oregon State will be subject to a sales tax of 25%. But according to Bitner, this argument may not compete with the federal government. The Federal Government has already assessed the benefits of tax revenue and social cost increases. "The federal government has compared it with alcohol legalization and the overall impact of alcohol on society," he said. As with cannabis, "Social costs are amazing compared to the actual income from alcohol production and sales."