An Argument for the Smoking Ban

Have you ever gone to a restaurant to eat your favorite food? And if you are ready to eat a bite, you will smoke in a nearby smoking area. This is a complaint from the audience of many non-smoking restaurants. Smoking and smoking cigarettes cause many health problems, but it is fair for Americans who want to smoke and enjoy it for free. This topic is very doubtful, and in many cases it has reached a compromise, but I have forbidden smoking in all public areas, like unfiltered smoke to the lungs of nonsmokers audience We argue that it should be, causing some major problems

& Lt; Tab / & gt; smoking ban should not be passed, but there are many arguments about who can agree? As health risks no longer matter for restaurants, smoking ban should be forced, people will be more happy, people will eat better. Even smokers can have a positive impact on society, so you can quickly understand and enjoy the fact that smoking bans occur.

Early discussions on smoking ban should be imposed at least to restrict oral, disgusting bystanders' health. However, despite the depletion of the development of such situations, the prohibition becomes more disturbing and such reasons are also disclosed as publicity, smokers, non-smokers will benefit society It will be diverted. I will never save my life. When Helena's research and heritage were first published, some scientists pointed out that the results are incredible and that the methodology has serious flaws. The journalist, including articles written by Jacob Salam, is too few for reporters (I am a writer as well) and British Christopher Snowdon. However, their criticisms are generally ignored. The study reported that a miraculous decline in heart attacks became a global headline, and if better studies contradict these results, they will mostly mark the media.

Other typical claims of smoking ban are economic. Members of the Tobacco Company and the Scottish Chartered Trade Association believe that a full ban is unnecessary and generally not supported (BBC 2004). Opponents who do not smoke believe that this weakens business, leads to unemployment, and deprives citizens of the right to drink (Johnson 2004, 8). Considering the president of Tim Raider Industry Association Tim Raider, a commissioned research from TMA showed 77% of Scotland against the full ban on smoking, especially against the ban on clubs, bars and pubs (BBC 2004) . However, independent research does not support these results. The policy memorandum founded the Scottish Parliament, found that 70% of Scotland's favor of smoking restrictions, 59% of restaurant owners do not expect any negative impact law (Scottish Parliament 2 to 2004)