An Argument Against Racial Profiling

When people behave according to their stereotypes, it means that stereotypes become big problems and affect others. Stereotypes are the main cause of profiling. In any race, you can conduct race profiling and analysis to discriminate victims who may not necessarily commit a crime. Innocent ethnic minorities may be depicted as doing bad things. According to the rights working group policy director Sameera Hazif, African-American Mahari Bailey drove Land Rover Range Rover and the police were asked to stop four times because he thought his behavior was suspicious (Hazif).

Discussions on race profiling include constitutional issues and practical considerations. According to Professor Kennedy, one of the strongest arguments against race profiling is based on the Equality Protection Clause of the US Constitution (No. 14 revision). Kennedy explained as follows: 'Discussion starts with a special meaning to claim racial discrimination' American life and law. Ethnic differences are different from other aspects of social stratification. Therefore, since the civil rights revolution of the 1960s, the courts have generally decided "Equal protection provision of the 14th amendment". There is enough rationality enough for officials to discriminate based on race. In this case, the court generally insists on "strict screening" of government action - the judicial review of the most severe level.

It is very important to understand racial profiling before beginning discussion on racial profiling. American Civil Liberties Union defines racial profiling as a discriminatory act by law enforcement officials to discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality (ethnicity: definition). Using this definition you can judge that race profiling does not include evidence of erroneous behavior and is completely dependent on the above function. We can see again ... See more

Discussion on racial profiling is inherently moral and the American Constitution is based on the fact that all citizens guarantee the right to equal protection under the land law (Avalon Plan). Therefore, racial analysis directly violates civil rights. We will deny that all Americans are treated primarily as members of all demographic categories, not being treated first as an American by law. There is also an obvious perspective that even the potential benefits of racial profiling do not necessarily cover costs. The fact that most of today's terrorists are coincidentally Muslims does not mean that in fact most Muslims are actually terrorists. In a nutshell, innocent people are being persecuted for no reason. This is obviously a serious moral dilemma.