An Analysis of The Intentional Fallacy, by Wimsatt and Beardsley

In their article "intentional mistake" (1946), William K. Vimsat Jr. and two of the most prominent figures of the literary critic's new critic school, Monroe C. Beardsley, the author of "intention" I do believe that I have not read. Required Elements While they were writing this article, it was widely believed that "In order to judge the performance of the poet, he must know his intention." This concept resulted in a so-called "intentional error". .

In 1946, William K. Vimsat and Monroe Beardsley announced a classic and controversial new review article "intentional mistake". I strongly opposed the author 's intention in analyzing literary works and the relevance of "intentional meaning". . For Wimsatt and Beardsley the text on the page is important; entering meaning from the outside of the text is considered irrelevant and may distract you. In another article, "emotional error" as a sister article of "intentional error", Wimsatt and Beardsley also discounted the reader's personal / emotional reaction to the text work as an effective means of text analysis I will. This paradox was later denied by a theorist from the reader reactive school of literary theory. One of the school's leading theorists, Stanley Fish, was trained by new critics. Fish accused Wimsatt and Beardsley in his article "Reader's Literature" (1970)

W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley are two of the most famous new criticism theorists. Their article 'Deliberately lagging' affected and further developed research on new criticism. It has had a great impact on the way scholars are currently criticizing. "Intentional error" reveals various "error" or misleading literary interpretation methods. It is wrong to believe that literature is going through the purpose of the author's own hypothesis. - Although there was some disagreement about the authenticity of the Galatians in the past (the apostle Paul wrote this letter to the church in the Galatian region of Rome), the credibility of the modern scholarship is without doubt

New criticism thinks that the intention of the author has nothing to do with understanding the document. W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley wrote in their article "Deliberate Falsehoods" as follows. They believe that the author can not be reconstructed from articles, the only source of meaning comes from the text itself and that the author 's desires and details of life are completely irrelevant.