An Account of the Nicaraguan Revolution

Explanation of the Nicaraguan Revolution August Cesar Jera's black eyes lost a sincere and practical aspect in the first few minutes of the conversation. Then his gaze slowly moved from my own eyes to the ceiling, not fixed at a particular point, it began to drift, as it faces away from the current place and time zone. He seems to say "I want to know the revolution," he seems to say from afar, his appearance is a well-thought-out expression, asked to remember the disturbing event and forced to evoke healing wounds long ago Reveal the man. pain

This article provides a detailed analysis of the Nicaraguan Revolution and discusses internal and external factors that brought about the Somoza regime overthrow in 1979. Nori's interpretation explains the historical context dating back to the 20th century. But her focus is on the relationship between the state and the upper class. She studied various theories of other scholars attempting to explain the cause of the multiclass alliance. It made them happy to part with the differences to achieve their common goals. This information source will help me explain the unique position of bourgeoisie in Nicaragua society and eventually participate in a revolutionary process. In her paper "Psychology theory of revolution", "Marxist approach," "Weakening support for political power", and "Top opposition" are particularly interested and relevant to my thesis.

A comparative study of the Cuban Revolution and the Nicaraguan Revolution reveals interesting political issues related to the dynamics of the political and socio-economic transformation processes. Differences between ideologies of two revolutions and political culture, differences in the institutionalization of the two revolution, contrasting election experiences, and establishing a completely different constitution resulted in a completely different political regime. The revolution of Cuba and Nicaragua is derived from a very similar historical and geographical background but it is quite different and provides a contrasting model of revolutionary change.

Introduction tries to present a theoretical discussion about social movements based on the development of Europe. Then in the second part of this article we will discuss the experience of the Nicaraguan Revolution from this point of view, pointing out some limitations of the original conceptual framework. In the following we will cover some of the theoretical issues to consider the Nicaraguan Revolution. This must be taken into account in the theory of social movements. First, the identity referred to in the conceptual framework can not be considered an "attribute", so we can classify (organize) individuals into groups (social movements). It is more effective to treat them as human relations or social human relations. The fact that the working class is predominant determines that class