American's Must ALWAYS have the Right to Bear Arms

"For the security of a free country, we need a well-controlled militia, people have the right to store weapons and carry them, they can not violate." These are written by our ancestors It is the word of the second revision. . Since then, many laws have passed the right to carry weapons. Laws are currently being drafted to give citizens the right to sue cancer manufacturers. If this goes through, who will be the next manufacturer, car manufacturer, toy company. It is necessary to solve the cause of the crime, not the tool being used.

The two sides do not agree with the meaning of "second amendment", but they also have a similar view on the right to carry weapons. Both believe that this right is fundamentally inconsistent with gun control. However, since the birth of the country gun rights and gun regulations exist. As a matter of the national constitution, Americans always have the right to hold and carry weapons. Today, 43 out of 50 state constitution clearly protects the right for individuals to own guns, except military service.

Since then, primarily due to the tradition of British law, the concept of the United States of carrying weapons' rights has been incorporated into the American Constitution and debated. Article 2 of the amendment to the Constitution of the United States asserts that Americans are armed with rights. That is a heritage that the UK has "weapons to protect". However, the British rights stipulated in the British Rights Bill of 1689 were limited to "Protestant subjects" - at that time about 90% of the population - and legislation appropriate for their conditions was allowed . Before the gun bill was submitted, the right to store and transport British guns was virtually unlimited.

To summarize the history we have been exploring, a single American voice is revealed in important founding documents, proof of case law in the 19th century, and post-civil legislation. The right to possess a weapon must include at least the right to hold a gun publicly for self defense. But wait! Although various opinions are presented, we have shown that the "just cause" does not consider the impact on the scope of the right to carry the second revision firearms to the public. According to various opinions, many states strictly restrict publicly carried weapons, there is no justifiable reason to fear human injury or property damage. Between 65 and 67 years old. Investigating the evidence of opponents forces us against